![]() In July, soon after the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. ![]() Missouri’s health department investigation centers on a federal law requiring medical facilities to determine whether a person seeking treatment may be in labor or whether they face an emergency health situation - or one that could develop into an emergency - and to provide treatment. We have reached out to the hospital for comment on the investigation and are waiting on a response. Hospital spokeswoman Liz Syer told the Associated Press, it’s their practice not to comment on patient care. Missouri’s abortion ban includes exceptions for medical emergencies, although doctors and hospitals have said they’re unsure exactly what that covers. “They were telling me to basically get out of the state to get the care that I needed,” the 41-year-old told the AP. She eventually got an abortion in Illinois.Īccording to the AP, records from that visit say doctors told Farmer that the law supersedes their medical judgment and “contrary to the most appropriate management based (on) my medical opinion, due to the legal language of MO law, we are unable to offer induction of labor at this time.” But because her fetus still had a heartbeat and her condition wasn’t considered a life-threatening medical emergency at that moment, they couldn’t terminate the pregnancy in Missouri, they told her. Doctors also told Farmer that “awaiting a medical emergency may put her at further risk for maternal mortality” or the removal of her uterus, medical records show.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |